Home | Conspirology

"IRANIAN CONSPIRACY", THE USA AND THE GULF MONARCHIES

"IRANIAN CONSPIRACY", THE USA AND THE GULF MONARCHIES

Saudi Arabia and the Gulf monarchies are the strategic partners of the USA, the unsinkable battleships of it. Obama’s office is ready for more than just piling Al Qods, drug traffic and Los Zetas into a single heap for them. They can go as far as exclaiming the new terrorist plot against America and create the new "Iranian Al-Qaeda" for that sake. State Department microphones and White House paper can bear that much and more.

This Tuesday U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder reported of the new and global conspiracy against the USA. It turned out that the agent of a special Al-Qods unit of Iranian Islamic Guards have been preparing to assassinate the Saudi Ambassador to the USA Adel Al-Jubeir.

Holder reported that one of the accused — naturalized U.S. citizen with an Iranian passport Mansur Arbabsiar — was arrested last month in New York. The alleged associate of his — Iranian citizen Gholam Shakuri — has also been in the USA, albeit his current whereabouts are obscure.

As it usually happens, the report is full of heart-rending and blood-chilling details. 56-year-old used cars seller Mansur Arbabsiar (it seems that his occupation drove the executives to dub the exposure operation "Chevrolet"), is seemingly to be played as the main defendant has hired professional killers from the Mexican drug cartel Los Zetas to do the job. Fortunately for the Saudi ambassador, the said killers happened to be the employees of the American special services. Yet, sinister Arbabsiar has confined himself with a single target. For the niggardly one and a half million dollars he demanded Los Zetas to blow the Israeli embassy in Washington along with the Saudi and the Israeli embassies in Argentine. In exchange for that used cars seller promised Los Zetas a greater happiness in the form of heavy opium loads to be dispatched from the Middle East to Mexico.

Such atrocious crimes couldn’t have been left without an angered response of the official Washington. Department of Justice charged the defendants with conspiring in order to assassinate a foreign official and the use of WMD in order to commit an international act of terror.

U.S. President Barack Obama received the Saudi Ambassador Adel al-Jubeir, greeted him with a divine deliverance and the second birth, reassuring him of presidential support. He also reminded him of the friendly ties between the USA and Saudi Arabia. So to say, if we keep up with our friendship, no "arbabsiars" will be able to threaten you, and you’d be safe from all the "shakuri" in the world.

Following a good old tradition "political campaign without a State Department participation is like a village without its own fool", Capitol Valkyrie Hillary Clinton joined the protests against the global Iranian atrocities. Being a proper lady, she’s not used to deny herself of anything, which is why her reaction was fierce. Furious Hillary would’ve surely won the "Life for you, Ambassador Adel Al-Jubeir" contest. "This plot" — she believes "has broken all the limits and Iran is to answer for it".

Lady Clinton’s logic in this incident is shockingly plain and clear. One of the chiefs of American law enforcement bodies, anonymously commenting the plot said: "This is so different from the way they usually act. This is not a state plan..." Response of a Violent Hillary is worth the annals: "The thought that they might contact the Mexican drug cartel to hire an assassin for the Saudi Ambassador — no one could’ve thought of that, haven’t they?" Be it as you wish, but the entire incident is strongly reminiscent of a statement of a certain U.S. Defense Secretary during the Iraqi campaign. When the cynically-minded journalist attacked him with the remarks that no proofs of the fact that Saddam Hussein had ever possessed weapons of mass destruction were granted, he confidently said: "Lack of clues in this case merely indicates our insufficient awareness of the presence of such proof".

Frankly speaking, we have to say that American law enforcement bodies have been skeptical about Iranian involvement from the very beginning. Looking at the prosecution charges, we may easily notice that they are building up on the "appetite comes with eating" principle. The first reports inform of the prepared attempts at the Saudi Ambassador. Few days after the explosions preparations were disclosed and a week later the schedule drug traffic rout to Mexico was exposed. Mind that all that was told by the man who has never been an Al-Qods member himself and even was hired as far back as in May 2011. Were the Iranian intelligence employees (considered to be one of the best in the world) struck with dementia so they had entrusted a low-level agent a strategic task?

Yet, the more curious and far-reaching testimony became — the more questions they’d been drawing in the USA itself. Simon Henderson, Washington Institute for Near East Policy officer has generalized the bewilderment: "Why might Iran wanted to commit such crime, with their prints "all over the case" here in the United States, where it would’ve surely influenced — and will influence — the U.S. policy towards Iran? If the disclosed official prosecution report was right and ‘about hundred and fifty men’, including ‘Senators’ were killed or wounded, the White House would’ve faced a tremendous political pressure for ordering a punitive strike at Iran".

"The Daily Beast" Editors share his opinion: "We shouldn’t consider Iranians an irrational nation, recklessly wishing to harm Americans by any means, as the Western media often tends to depict them. Even after the purge of 2009, Tehran regime is not even Iraq of Saddam Hussein by far — in his ill-considered aggression the latter one has brought his accidental suicide nigh". As the saying goes "what an accurate wording".

The artificiality of the incident is striking, yet why was it necessary in the first place? Which goals doest pursue? Weird as it may seem, Hillary Clinton herself answered this: "The profound arguments we’ve discovered today have give us more leverage to exert upon Iran". Saudi leadership has dubbed an assassination attempt at its diplomat a provocation.

Saudi Shiite rallies that started a week ago have once again fallen out of media attention (just like it happened with Bahrain). The rally has seemingly become massive enough, as long as the Saudi failed to strangle it as an embryo. The address of Prince Nayef, Foreign Minister of the Kingdom, indirectly proves the large scale of this rally, who stated that the revolted people act "at the foreign instigation" (which is an implication to Iran as we know by Bahraini events). Prince Nayef has also promised to "strike down" the protesters "with an iron fist".

Bahraini events make an utterly unequivocal display of what Saudi mean by "striking down with an iron fist" — total oppression of the civil population. Yet, the USA and its allies consider it not quite politically correct. Innocent minds might start asking improper questions: "Why do we name the Syrian attempts to suppress the externally instigated rebellion an ‘atrocity’ and demand imposing sanctions against Asad’s regime and carrying out humanitarian intervention, while the same actions of Saudi dynasty are called the protection of safety and stability?" The campaign of "fighting Iranian terrorists in the USA" has been invented to cut these very questions down. Pumping this case up would allow the White House to state that Saudi Arabia doesn’t merely oppress its citizens, but fights terrorism instead. In this case the USA itself supports "a victim of Iranian terrorism", rather than an oppressive regime, torturing its own people.

Saudi Arabia and the Gulf monarchies are the strategic partners of the USA, the unsinkable battleships of it. Obama’s office is ready for more than just piling Al Qods, drug traffic and Los Zetas into a single heap for them. They can go as far as exclaiming the new terrorist plot against America and create the new "Iranian Al-Qaeda" for that sake. State Department microphones and White House paper can bear that much and more...

By Igor Pankratenko

 

 

 

RSS Twitter Facebook
 
 

Similar entries

  • Speaking of official Tehran not being privy to Arbabsiar’s plots, American analysts can’t rule out the possibility that a full-scale and sophisticated provocation is unleashing right before our eyes: "Is it possible that the assumed conspiracy was the provocation of external powers, trying to flint a conflict between Iran and its enemies?"

  • The most likely contender for the throne, Nayef bin Abdel-Aziz al Saud, is a hardcore adherent of the Saudi hegemony. His coming to power will accelerate the creation of a "new Caliphate" founded upon the GCC, including Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Oman and Saudi Arabia. Moreover, this union will be expanded on the account of Jordan and Morocco. It goes without saying that Nayef will attempt to give the GCC nuclear program a kick-start, although proceeding from what we already know, it’s clear that in a year (two at most) we’re to hear the official statement that the "new Caliphate" disposes nuclear weapon.

  • It was in Cairo where a Saudi prince made public the sensational news about the existence of Qatar — Israel conspiracy. He came there to express protest concerning the decision of the king of Saudi Arabia to appoint Saudi Amir (Prince) Nayef bin Abdul Aziz an heir to the throne bypassing his five older brothers, including Amir Talal. So President Assad gets one more ace — the growing tension in the states that have played the most important role in all Arab revolutions until now.

  • Will the internationally-recognized Transitional National Council be created in Bahrain? Will the UN pass a resolution, condemning the "doctors’ genocide"? Will the members of Bahraini royal family considered persona non grata? Will the Bahraini foreign accounts be suspended? Surely, not. At least, not until there’s an American military base in this island state.

  • Algerian militants are tightly bound to the Special Services of certain Gulf States, pursuing their own goals. Time of peace for Algerian is at an end. Talkative Italian Prime Minister Berlusconi has indirectly confirmed it, announcing his intention to replace the Algerian gas with Libyan one soon enough. Mind that Algeria as a supplier has never left a handle for reproaches.

In this section

"NUCLEAR CALIPHATE" ON THE AGENDA OF THE DAY. Death of Sultan bin Abdul Aziz al-Saudi and the intrigues about the Saudi throne
The most likely contender for the throne, Nayef bin Abdel-Aziz al Saud, is a hardcore adherent of the Saudi hegemony. His coming to power will accelerate the creation of a "new Caliphate" founded upon the GCC, including Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Oman and Saudi Arabia. Moreover, this union will be expanded on the account of Jordan and Morocco. It goes without saying that Nayef will attempt to give the GCC nuclear program a kick-start, although proceeding from what we already know, it’s clear that in a year (two at most) we’re to hear the official statement that the "new Caliphate" disposes nuclear weapon.

 

WHO AND WHY NEEDS THE DEAL WITH HAMAS?
Recently too many time-servers, profiteering from keeping the conflict intensity on high level (rather than small) appeared in Israel that fights the terrorist with one hand and feeds them with another one. If this dragon is not nourished with money and arms and no fresh blood is transfused to him, he pines quickly. Now the Israeli government decided to repeat the trick that used to produce flawless results in the past: to reinforce the military organization with most frenzied and experienced terrorists.

 

WAG THE DOG: POOR TAKE OF OBAMA. "Attempt" on the Saudi Ambassador to the USA: Foreign analysts on the official Washington version
Speaking of official Tehran not being privy to Arbabsiar’s plots, American analysts can’t rule out the possibility that a full-scale and sophisticated provocation is unleashing right before our eyes: "Is it possible that the assumed conspiracy was the provocation of external powers, trying to flint a conflict between Iran and its enemies?"

 

"IRANIAN CONSPIRACY", THE USA AND THE GULF MONARCHIES
Saudi Arabia and the Gulf monarchies are the strategic partners of the USA, the unsinkable battleships of it. Obama’s office is ready for more than just piling Al Qods, drug traffic and Los Zetas into a single heap for them. They can go as far as exclaiming the new terrorist plot against America and create the new "Iranian Al-Qaeda" for that sake. State Department microphones and White House paper can bear that much and more.

 

TERRORS OF PRIŠTINA. New facts about the Western special services, hiding KLC criminal activity
Small town of Priština (even judging by European measure) — capital of the unrecognized "Republic of Kosovo" — has long been known as a center of the South-European organized crime, featuring all the conventional trades of the kind — drug and arms traffic, prostitution. Now it was officially proven that it is also the heart of the most disgusting sort of crime — "black" transplantology.

 

AMERICAN NMD AND THE "GREATER ROMANIA" PROJECT
Oddities of the officially presented meaning of the U.S. NMD system may be discussed for a long time. So, the intercepting missiles, launched from Romania are to bring the hypothetical Iranian rockets down in over Turkey. In Turkey itself it is planned to station merely AWACS radar. According to the logic of the missile strikes, the latter one should be attack in the first place, because after that the attack at Europe and the USA can be waged with a much greater success. If we draw all the bases and radar of American NMD system as the points of a circle, it is the Russian Federation rather than Iran that happens to be in the center of it.

 

.